Which of the following best describes incompatible goals in conflicts?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the ASU COM312 Communication, Conflict, and Negotiation Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Access hints and explanations to ensure you're exam-ready!

Incompatible goals in conflicts typically refer to situations where the objectives of the parties involved are fundamentally opposed or cannot be simultaneously achieved. The choice that states "Goals may only exist in perception" accurately captures this concept because conflicts often arise from differing perceptions of needs, desires, or interests.

When parties perceive their goals as incompatible, it can create a barrier to negotiation and resolution. The conflict is rooted not just in factual disagreements, but also in the subjective interpretation of those goals. This highlights the importance of communication and understanding, as resolving conflicts often involves aligning perceptions and finding common ground.

The other options do not fit the concept of incompatible goals effectively. For instance, stating that goals are "always real and aligned" contradicts the idea of conflict altogether. Saying "Both parties agree on the same objective" contradicts the very definition of incompatible goals since agreement on objectives usually indicates compatibility rather than opposition. Thus, "Goals may only exist in perception" is the most fitting description of incompatible goals in conflicts.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy